-2 +0 -2
Kudos
#239239 (Top 81.3647%)
| Kudos/dag | -0 |
| Kudos/reaguursel | -2 |
| Meeste kudos op 1 reaguursel | -2 |
| Minste kudos op 1 reaguursel | -2 |
-2 +0 -2
Kudos
#239239 (Top 81.3647%)
| Kudos/dag | -0 |
| Kudos/reaguursel | -2 |
| Meeste kudos op 1 reaguursel | -2 |
| Minste kudos op 1 reaguursel | -2 |
1
Reaguursels
| Reaguursels/dag | 0 |
| Topreaguursels | 0 |
| Woorden per reaguursel | 147 |
| Reacties per reaguursel | 0 |
| Meeste reaguursels op 1 dag | 1 |
| Aantal x weggejorist | 0 |
| Geregistreerd op | 20-12-2014 |
| Eerste reactie op | 20-12-2014 |
Shop via onze link — jij betaalt niets extra, wij krijgen een klein steuntje van Amazon 💚
*Als Amazon-partner verdient Dumpstats aan in aanmerking komende aankopen. Dank voor je support!*
Kudoverloop over tijd
-2 kudos 2014-12-21 00:34:40 op He gozertje, Je hoofd staat scheef
Hmmm,
"The British Medical Journal recently undertook an general analysis of common medical treatments to determine which are supported by sufficient reliable evidence. They evaluated around 2,500 treatments, and the results were as follows:
13 percent were found to be beneficial
23 percent were likely to be beneficial
Eight percent were as likely to be harmful as beneficial
Six percent were unlikely to be beneficial
Four percent were likely to be harmful or ineffective.
This left the largest category, 46 percent, as unknown in their effectiveness. In other words, when you take your sick child to the hospital or clinic, there is only a 36 percent chance that he will receive a treatment that has been scientifically demonstrated to be either beneficial or likely to be beneficial."
Meer dan de helft van de medische behandelingen is dus (mogelijk) kwakzalverij...
Bedenk zelf maar hoe we aan de huidige medische kennis zijn gekomen. Al die oordelen meteen..